How Ordinary People Talk About Terrorism

This blog was first published on the Politics blog here.

Since 9/11, terrorism has become a ubiquitous and seemingly permanent feature of our everyday lives, from news and media entertainment, to security measures when we travel or visit public venues. Our Politics article, “Talking about Terrorism: A Study of Vernacular Discourse” seeks to better understand the vernacular “everyday narratives” of lay members of the public in their everyday talk about terrorism. We argue that while there are a great many studies of how elites speak about terrorism, as well as a large number of public opinion studies, there are fewer studies which focus on how ordinary people speak about terrorism-related topics in their daily conversation. As a consequence, we don’t yet fully understand how ordinary people understand and conceptualise – or how they “know” – what terrorism is, how it manifests, what its causes are, and how it is most effectively dealt with.

It is important to study this systematically because it will enrich our understanding of public opinion – how important political discourses are articulated by different actors, how they are consumed by audiences, how they circulate in society, how they are resisted, how dominant they are in practice, and how they deal with questions of legitimacy and public policy. In this study, we employed a form of conversation analysis used in discursive psychology with groups of lay members of the public to try and gain a deeper, more dynamic description of the narratives, commonplaces, cultural repertoires, frames, and metaphors deployed in vernacular speech, as well as a deeper understanding of how such shared cultural resources are constructed inter-subjectively in social interaction.

Some of our findings from the study were unsurprising. For example, we found that many ordinary people speak about, and understand, terrorism in ways that closely mirror the primary messages about terrorism in the media and from elites – such as that terrorism poses a major threat to Western societies, and that terrorists are driven by religious extremism. It was also unsurprising to confirm that many ordinary people use popular films as a frame to interpret contemporary events relating to terrorism. On the other hand, we were surprised to discover that most ordinary people cannot distinguish between war and terrorism, and often consider that Western wars are a kind of terrorism that we impose on other societies. It was also interesting to find that most ordinary people do not have consistent views about terrorism, but evidence a lot of dissonance and contradiction, and, in contradiction to many academics, they accept that states can be terrorists too.

About richardjacksonterrorismblog

I am currently Professor of Peace Studies and the Director of the National Peace and Conflict Studies Centre at the University of Otago, New Zealand. Prior to this, I was Professor of International Politics at Aberystwyth University in Wales, UK. I study and teach on issues of pacifism and nonviolence, terrorism, political violence, conflict resolution and war. I have published several books on these topics, including: The Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies (Routledge, 2016); Terrorism: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2011; co-authored with Lee Jarvis, Jeroen Gunning and Marie Breen Smyth); Contemporary State Terrorism: Theory and Cases (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010; edited by Richard Jackson, Eamon Murphy and Scott Poynting); Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009; edited by Richard Jackson, Marie Breen Smyth and Jeroen Gunning); Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-first Century: Principles, Methods and Approaches (Ann Arbor MI: Michigan University Press, 2009; co-authored with Jacob Bercovitch); and Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counterterrorism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005). I am also the editor-in-chief of the academic journal, Critical Studies on Terrorism. In 2014, I published a research-based novel entitled, Confessions of a Terrorist (Zed Books, 2014) which explores the mind and motivation of a terrorist.
This entry was posted in Terrorism and Extremism, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How Ordinary People Talk About Terrorism

  1. Ron Hirschbein says:

    Hello once again, Richard, and thanks for sending the blog. Indeed, discourse analysis of ordinary usage is vital and revealing. As I suggest in my book, these days “terrorism” is worse than death, a bad news///good news morbid joke: The bad news—your family was murdered; the good news—it wasn’t terrorism. But terrorism didn’t always get bad press: It was celebrated for winningWWII, and for keeping the peace during the Cold War. In a quip, perhaps Chomsky offered the best definition: “Terrorism is violence you don’t like.”

    Good to be in touch, once again. Hope all’s well in your part of the world.


  2. nitish011 says:

    Terrorism always, according to my own thoughts, have been potraited wrong by the common people.people always compare terrorism with the religion that’s specially isalam. I remember once in a crowd on day of ID a person saying islam is all about violence. Every religion has its own negative and positive aspects even Hinduism has a lot of terrifying stories related to the religion. Its just terrorism coming mainly from the arab country, the mind set of common people is about the religion and not the people. Muslims in india, eve the citizens of this particular religion face discrimination for no reason. On one place secularism is promoted and on the other hand muslims are being humiliated. There are very few places left in india where prospection towards islam is clean and clear hearted. Terrorism is a thing that a human possess not any religion. Talking of terrorism there is no country who’s cases of terrorism have been fied but no idea why only Islamic countries are highlighted. Terrorism should be put to an end not the humanity by discriminating on the bases of religion, otherwise what is the difference between the common people and terrorist
    -Nitish Markan

  3. ocelot says:

    terrorist are like hyenas

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s